About Me

Name: Richard
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Conservative Elite and the Real Americans

A nice piece at American Thinker by Rick Moran that casts some light on how and why there are some leaders in the conservative movement that are just a different side of the same elitist coin.  That being said he goes on to explain why there is a need for "urban" conservatives, as opposed to those of us that live in  flyover country. 
 
"The friction between the two sides is obvious. What has brought it to the fore now is distrust. There is more trust in a roomful of thieves today than there is in a room full of conservatives.  And Palin is the focal point where both sides seek to measure the other's conservative bona fides. The populists see most criticism of Palin coming from elites as signs of squishiness. They believe (rightly) that the elites have no idea how embattled they feel. To many in the heartland, this race has been a nightmare what with the government of George Bush abandoning all pretense that they were conservative and resorting to rank socialism to deal with the financial crisis.This, coupled with a mainstream media so obviously in the tank for Obama along with a fierce rejection of conservatism by many of their friends and neighbors has literally upended the world the populists knew just a few short years ago."
 
In the piece Mr. Moran stresses how it is the urban conservatives that put folks such as Rudy Guiliani (although he tends to be more of a fiscal one),  into office in NYC, while it is the flyover folks that swept Newt Gingrich and conservative Republicans into office. Both of these events, if you recall happened in the last decade of the previous century.  Both had some wonderful effects and brought to light the traditional beliefs of most Americans. 
 
I would suggest that he is stating in a round about way that for conservatism to succeed each group needs the strengths of the other one;
 
"At bottom, I think the elites blame the base for what could very well be an electoral disaster while the populists are all set to lay the blame for any election disappointments at the feet of the elites for what they see as a betrayal of conservatism itself in its hour of need."
 
So what is to be done? Can both groups get it together or will there be a division that cannot be reconciled?  Only election day will answer this question.
Read article here
 
Read related article here
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let the People Speak

I have posted in the past my thoughts on abortion as I am a pro-life advocate.   The voters of South Dakota have an opportunity, on election day via the ballot box, to vote on an initiative and to decide for themselves what they think is the right course of action.   I urge them to choose life. 
 
Two years ago a similar proposal was put forth and was defeated. Those voting against it stating that it was to restrictive and did not make for certain allowances for extreme situations.  Fair enough, the people spoke and the supporters of the bill went back and returned with this year's proposal that includes the allowances that opponents had mentioned.
 

"Opponents say the new measure would jeopardize the patient-doctor relationship because physicians could be criminally charged for exceeding its bounds. They also argue that its exceptions are too narrowly defined and that it would force some women to carry an unhealthy fetus."

As usual there are those, who have stated their thoughts in the quote above  that will always be opposed to limiting any form of abortion even paritial birth, (A certain Senator Government, comes to mind), however I firmly believe most Americans would like to see this practice pretty much curtailed and restricted. 

I do question what their definition of an "unhealthy fetus" would actually entail.  Would it be like Governor Palin's child? In today's medical field we are constantly hearing about doctors that are performing invitro operations to make corrections of a baby's heart, lungs and other organs and as such I find the abovementioned reasoning out of touch with what can really be achieved through medical care.

It seems to me that the Pro abortion groups are always on the lookout for some reason, any reason that would derail any attempt at restricting and redifining the practice of abortion. 
 
Read article here
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Backburner News Entry 41

Why am I not surprised after reading this article? All of this now explains why Felix Unger and Oscar Madison were always getting on each others nerves.
 
Read story here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Backburner News Entry 40

With all the news about the election going on I thought it might be nice to read something, anything, that might bring a smile to our faces.  I have to admit though this is a very, very strange idea.
 
Read story here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Backburner News Entry 39

Oh this is breaking my heart,,,,so sad.
 
Read story here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Backburner news Entry 38

While the US Congress here in the states is constantly holding hearings on big oil and their windfall profits, (as an aside, why don't they ever question the entertainment industry and their huge profits?),  the Chinese are conducting investigations into Big Milk. The diffence is, there is little concern for obscene profits.  Well actually I take that back there is concern but it is related to how much they stand to lose in obscene profits, even though you won't read it.
 
Read story here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Some Great Insight

American Thinker has a wonderful piece on how a small business owner is going to tank or get out while the gettin's good.
 
Read article here
 
I also got a chance to listen to Rush Limbaugh yesterday afternoon and this one caller had calculated his taxes as a small business owner using pre-tax cut Clinton administration tax figures and found he will definately be paying more. 
 
Read the transcript here. (you'll have to scroll down a good ways, but it is worth the read)
 
Both of these will be the result of Obamanomics
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A New Phrase for the Coming Phase

With the seeming possibilty of a Democrat controlled Presidency, and fillabuster proof majority in congress, the golden chains of Socialism is soon to decend on all Americans. I have therefore taken the liberty of coining a new word:
 
Obamanomics: A political belief disquised as an economic theory that increasing taxes on the wealthy, on corporations and spending your way out of a down economy will somehow stimulate it and put it back on track. This belief  is founded upon Marxist ideas; each according to his ability to each according to his means, or as Senator Government calls it "spreading the wealth around". 
 
Sadly it seems many Americans are buying into this concept of government bringnig us into prosperity.  I am here to say that any government enterprise simply shall not and cannot in and of itself ever, ever do so. 
 
Allow me to cite an example.
 
I was a former window clerk for the USPS. We are, as you might know a quais-government run company, sort of like Fannie and Freddie, only we don't lend out money.  Part of our sales inventory are mailing boxes and envelopes, such as the padded ones. Now the products themselves are good products, (no not making a plug here just stating my own opinion), however we sell them way over the price of say your local Walmart.   I inquired about that one day and was informed that we, as a government agency could NOT undersell against private industry. Now while that is a great idea because it puts private companies a leg up on us, the competetion, it is not really very good business sense.  How, can any business expect to stay viable, show profit, without being flexiable enough maintain a competative edge?
 
Now admittedly the USPS is more of a service related  (the delivery of mail) organization than it is a product company, but it seemed to me that we were missing a golden opportunity to expand the USPS into other areas. 
 
BTW, the USPS, according to it's charter as a private/government enterprise is not allowed to show a profit. We have a plus or minus window that allows us to operate.
 
So herein is the point I am trying to make; Government cannot run a business, period.  They have failed in so many areas it would be a joke if it weren't so sad. 
 
I will add here a little known fact. During the early part of this nations history the fur trade was the big business.  Under our first President George Washington the federal government endeavored to set up federal trading posts. The results were less than spectacular and withinin a few years the idea was scrapped.  Why? Well it turned out that most of the traders and purchasers found that they got more for their products and/or more for their money at the private posts. 
 
Obamanomics is nothing new, just an old and failed policy, tried anew
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Surely You Jest

MSNBC, has a piece on ACORN's voter registration fraud scandle.  Someone at MSNBC, wondered is it a distraction.  Surely they jest.  Had this been a scandle linking either a conservative or republican candidate it would be not only, "not"be a distraction, but it would be major headline news.  The fact that bloggers and conservative talking heads, have been bringing this out in the open time and again has finally forced the MSM to make it into a news story.  Yet they seem to think it a trivial matter at best.
 
Read story and veiw video here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Question of Character

One would think that a Presidental candidate would have unquestionable character.  It is defined by ethics, honesty, compassion, and other factors that make us who we are.  However character is also defined by those you have had association with, and as such Senator Obama lacks in the area.
 
Read story here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ACORN Does it Again

This morning I was live streaming a radio station from I believe Texas and the topic of conversation was that ACORN had registed... MICKEY MOUSE!  Now at first I thought this has to be a joke, or just a rumor.  However I was just listening to WABC News from NYC, and that story was confirmed.  
 
Now what is even more interesting is the following story from the NY Post.  These people will stop at nothing to win. But why should we be surprised, after all the left has no moral compass, so as the saying goes; "It's all good".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Breaker Breaker, It's Out in the Open

I live in Western KY, and I work at night.  I am currently sitting in our breakroom, listening to the channel 3 news which is the ABC affiliate for this area.  Some reporter, I didn't catch her name, but actually came out and actually said "the government is planning to nationalize some banks."  This only adds weight to my previous post.   Get ready komrade Americans, big brother is coming to a neighborhood near you with their golden chains.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USSA Update, and the Coming New World Order

Apparently the Ameican people will soon be wearing the golden chains of socialisim.
 
"'This is bigger than the private sector can fix by itself," said James A. Baker III, who served under President Reagan. Robert Rubin, treasury secretary under President Clinton and now an adviser to Barack Obama, said it was important "to be highly, highly proactive.'"
 
Translation of the above - look for us to begin nationalizing all private industry that has "problems"
 
Click here and here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Text of President Bush's Speech October 11, 2008

Good morning. Over the past few days, we have witnessed a startling drop in the stock market - much of it driven by uncertainty and fear. This has been a deeply unsettling period for the American people. Many of our citizens have serious concerns about their retirement accounts, their investments, and their economic well-being.

Here's what the American people need to know: that the United States government is acting; we will continue to act to resolve this crisis and restore stability to our markets. We are a prosperous nation with immense resources and a wide range of tools at our disposal. We're using these tools aggressively.

The fundamental problem is this: As the housing market has declined, banks holding assets related to home mortgages have suffered serious losses. As a result of these losses, many banks lack the capital or the confidence in each other to make new loans. In turn, our system of credit has frozen, which is keeping American businesses from financing their daily transactions - and creating uncertainty throughout our economy.

This uncertainty has led to anxiety among our people. And that is understandable - that anxiety can feed anxiety, and that can make it hard to see all that is being done to solve the problem. The federal government has a comprehensive strategy and the tools necessary to address the challenges in our economy. Fellow citizens: We can solve this crisis - and we will.

Here are the problems we face and the steps we are taking:

First, key markets are not functioning because there's a lack of liquidity - the grease necessary to keep the gears of our financial system turning. So the Federal Reserve has injected hundreds of billions of dollars into the system. The Fed has joined with central banks around the world to coordinate a cut in interest rates. This rate cut will allow banks to borrow money more affordably - and it should help free up additional credit necessary to create jobs, and finance college educations, and help American families meet their daily needs. The Fed has also announced a new program to provide support for the commercial paper market, which is freezing up. As the new program kicks in over the next week or so, it will help revive a key source of short-term financing for American businesses and financial institutions.

Second, some Americans are concerned about whether their money is safe. So the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the National Credit Union Administration have significantly expanded the amount of money insured in savings accounts, and checking accounts, and certificates of deposit. That means that if you have up to $250,000 in one of these insured accounts, every penny of that money is safe. The Treasury Department has also acted to restore confidence in a key element of America's financial system by offering government insurance for money market mutual funds.

Thirdly, we are concerned that some investors could take advantage of the crisis to illegally manipulate the stock market. So the Securities and Exchange Commission has launched rigorous enforcement actions to detect fraud and manipulation in the market. The SEC is focused on preventing abusive practices, such as putting out false information to drive down particular stocks for personal gain. Anyone caught engaging in illegal financial activities will be prosecuted.

Fourth, the decline in the housing market has left many Americans struggling to meet their mortgages and are concerned about losing their homes. My administration has launched two initiatives to help responsible borrowers keep their homes. One is called HOPE NOW, and it brings together homeowners and lenders and mortgage services and others to find ways to prevent foreclosure. The other initiative is aimed at making it easier for responsible homeowners to refinance into affordable mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration. So far, these programs have helped more than 2 million Americans stay in their home. And the point is this: If you are struggling to meet your mortgage, there are ways that you can get help.

With these actions to help to prevent foreclosures, we're addressing a key problem in the housing market: The supply of homes now exceeds demand. And as a result, home values have declined. Once supply and demand balance out, our housing market will be able to recover - and that will help our broader economy begin to grow.

Fifth, we've seen that problems in the financial system are not isolated to the United States. They're also affecting other nations around the globe. So we're working closely with partners around the world to ensure that our actions are coordinated and effective. Tomorrow, I'll meet with the finance ministers from our partners in the G7 and the heads of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Secretary [Henry] Paulson will also meet with finance ministers from the world's 20 leading economies. Through these efforts, the world is sending an unmistakable signal: We're in this together, and we'll come through this together.

And finally, American businesses and consumers are struggling to obtain credit, because banks do not have sufficient capital to make loans. So my administration worked with Congress to quickly pass a $700 billion financial rescue package. This new law authorizes the Treasury Department to use a variety of measures to help bank (sic) rebuild capital - including buying or insuring troubled assets and purchasing equity of financial institutions. The Department will implement measures that have maximum impact as quickly as possible. Seven hundred billion dollars is a significant amount of money. And as we act, we will do it in a way that is effective.

The plan we are executing is aggressive. It is the right plan. It will take time to have its full impact. It is flexible enough to adapt as the situation changes. And it is big enough to work.

The federal government will continue to take the actions necessary to restore stability to our financial markets and growth to our economy. We have an outstanding economic team carrying out this effort, led by Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, SEC Chairman Chris Cox, and FDIC Chair Sheila Bair. I thank them and their dedicated teams for their service during this important moment in our country's history.

This is an anxious time, but the American people can be confident in our economic future. We know what the problems are, we have the tools we need to fix them, and we're working swiftly to do so. Our economy is innovative, industrious and resilient because the American people who make up our economy are innovative, industrious and resilient. We all share a determination to solve this problem - and that is exactly what we're going to do. May God bless you. To top of page

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Breaker Breaker

Presdient Bush is currently speaking from the White House, after meeting with the G-7 nations. The President has promised cooperation with all G-7 nations.
 
Read more here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive